![]() Students should tailor their admissions essays to describe how race had affected their lives, said Shannon Gundy, an admissions official at the University of Maryland, in a recent presentation sponsored by the American Council on Education. Some education officials have already discussed how to leverage the essay. “The chances of an individual school getting sued are low, and the cost of suing is really high.” “I think a very plausible outcome of this will be that schools will just cheat and say, ‘Let’s see who gets sued,’” said Richard Sander, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, who has been critical of affirmative action. How can they know whether an admissions decision was based on an essay about personal grit - or the race of the applicant that it revealed? But for outside skeptics, untangling a university’s intentions will be challenging. Universities, including Harvard and U.N.C., said on Thursday that they would comply with the ruling. “Many universities have for too long done just the opposite.” “In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual - not on the basis of race,” he wrote. Still, he warned that the personal essay could not play a stealth role in telegraphing race. “Nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration or otherwise,” he wrote. And in the decision, Justice Roberts specifically kept the door open to consider racial or ethnic background in someone’s lived experience. It would be nearly impossible, however, to eliminate any mention or suggestion of race in the admissions process - starting with applicants’ names. ![]() “We remain vigilant and intend to initiate litigation should universities defiantly flout this clear ruling,” he wrote in a statement on Thursday. He promised to enforce the decision, saying that Students for Fair Admissions and its counsel “have been closely monitoring potential changes in admissions procedures.” In an interview, Edward Blum, the founder and president of Students for Fair Admissions, the plaintiff, defended what he called “standard measurements” of academic qualifications, citing studies that showed test scores, grades and coursework helped determine which students would thrive at competitive schools. “It’s a complex process, and this opinion will make it even more complex.” “Will it become more opaque? Yes, it will have to,” said Danielle Ren Holley, who is about to take over as president of Mount Holyoke College. ![]() Officials at some universities predicted that there would be less emphasis on standardized metrics like test scores and class rank, and more emphasis on personal qualities, told through recommendations and the application essay - the opposite of what many opponents of affirmative action had hoped for. had harsh words for Harvard and the University of North Carolina, calling their admissions process “elusive," “opaque” and “imponderable.”īut the court’s ruling against the two universities on Thursday could lead to an admissions system that is even more subjective and mysterious, as colleges try to follow the law but also admit a diverse class of students. ![]() In the Supreme Court decision striking down racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions, Chief Justice John G. By Anemona Hartocollis | The New York Times | JUN. Colleges have a game plan, like emphasizing the personal essay, but so do conservative groups that promise to monitor and, if necessary, go back to court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |